Site moved to, redirecting in 1 second...

« New Jersey's Governor's Commission on Rationalizing Health Care Resources issues final report | Main | Blawg Review #144 is up at Cyberlaw Central »

January 27, 2008

Massachusetts universal health care costs -- higher than expected or no?

Last week, after Governor Patrick's state of the state address, the Boston Globe ran a story by Alice Dembner on the projected increases in costs of the Massachusetts universal health care coverage lawA Healthy Blog deconstructs the math, concluding that the costs are not as high as the Globe would have us think

Without getting into the numbers here, the key point for me in all this is that improving health care for all requires improving several things: access, quality and cost.  It's  a three-legged stool; can't have one without the others.  However, the political reality is that you can't have it all at once.  As I (and plenty of others
. . . see, e.g., Speaker Sal DiMasi's recent post at Commonhealth) have been saying for a while now, the only way to achieve health care reform -- in Massachusetts or nationally -- is incrementalism, baby.

Here in the former people's republic of Massachusetts, we've taken the first steps towards assuring universal access (in terms of coverage; access in terms of actually having primary care providers available is a whole other story).  The other "legs" will come -- the quality leg is well underway and cost will ultimately be addressed in myriad ways, including reductions in cost thanks to access to primary care as well as paradigm shifts in reimbursement such as the recently-announced Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts experiment.

The question remains:  Will everyone remain patient enough to let this experiment play itself out?  See Boston ERISA blogger Stephen Rosenberg's thoughts about the Globe story and ERISA pre-emption issues; I've written before about the ERISA pre-emption question as well.  Thus far, the coalition that brought this law into being does not seem likely to break up and result in such a challenge being raised.

-- David Harlow    


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Massachusetts universal health care costs -- higher than expected or no?:

» And Still Another View on Preemption and the Massachusetts Health Care Reform Act from Boston ERISA Law Blog
Ive noted in the past that the problem with state health care reform acts mandating health insurance is that they dont tackle the issue that is deterring employers from providing broader health insurance benefits, namely the ever increasi... [Read More]

» The light goes on: universal coverage and cost control are related from Trusted.MD Network
The universal health care/cost control connection is flashing all around our fair city, from Steve Bailey in the Boston Globe to Robert Kuttner (of the American Prospect) in the New England Journal of Medicine. Interesting to see their different takes... [Read More]

» Leah Binder, CEO of the Leapfrog Group, speaks with David Harlow about hospital-acquired infections from Trusted.MD Network
In an interview earlier this week, Leah Binder previewed some of the concerns likely to be aired at next week's Chasing Zero Summit in DC.The audio file of my interview with Leah Binder (about 25 minutes long) is available for... [Read More]


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


The quality leg is really not well underway. It is moving at the speed of molasses in most of the industry. I hope this will change. It is an essential part of cost containment -- and of course, of saving lives.


Paul --

You are way out front on this piece. (Other readers out there, see ). Other folks will get there eventually -- on their own or thanks to the emerging state requirements under Chapter 58.

The comments to this entry are closed.