« Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (2009 MPFS): Yes, there's a 5.7% cut, but it's packed with goodies like telehealth and gainsharing | Main | Pan Mass Challenge coming up this weekend »

July 16, 2008

Yes Virginia, the GAO points a finger at diagnostic imaging providers

"Round up the usual suspects!

Once again, diagnostic imaging providers are singled out by the federales. This time the GAO says controls on diagnostic imaging utilization are needed -- including (yikes!) prior authorization requirements -- because diagnostic imaging costs have doubled between 2000 and 2006.  Sounds serious. Well, guess what?  While some advanced imaging costs have increased at a faster rate, the cost of employment-based health insurance has also doubled in the same time frame.  (In addition, this rampant growth story is half of an unintended consequences story -- service settings have changed: less hospital, more physician office.  Also, imaging, while expensive, is cheaper -- and easier on the patient -- than exploratory surgery . . . . )

My inbox has been graced with a couple of press releases on this topic from, yes, the usual suspects -- MITA and AMIC -- decrying the government's heavy-handedness. MITA referred to an interesting report on diagnostic imaging released last week by Avalere Health, which MITA had commissioned.  (Coincidentally, I met Avalere's founder, Dan Mendelson, last weekend -- but that's another story entirely.) 

The Avalere imaging report (an interesting read, by the way) points to the utility of a number of strategies worthy of wider consideration, rather than focusing like GAO on layering prior authorization requirements on top of retrospective utilization review.  These are,   

primarily [, ] three sets of approaches – updated and more comprehensive appropriateness guidelines; enhanced accreditation and certification programs; and expanded education and training – [which are] programs [that] can influence provider behavior, imaging quality, and patient care.

The first of these really caught my interest.  To the extent such a system can be implemented without adding significantly to the ordering clinician's administrative burden, I'm all in favor.  In fact, that's the sort of thing that should be propagated across the entire medical-industrial complex, not just imaging: expert EHR systems incorporating evidence-based medicine (EBM) into computerized physician order entry (CPOE). 

-- David Harlow

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d52c69e200e553bb9caf8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Yes Virginia, the GAO points a finger at diagnostic imaging providers:

Comments

Subscribe by RSS or email

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

  • Subscribe with Kindle
AddThis Social Bookmark Button


  • 2009 Pan Mass Challenge 

    Please sponsor me as I bicycle 200 miles in 2 days this summer to raise money for cancer research and treatment

HealthBlawg on Twitter

My Web Site

  • Google

    Search the Web
    Search HealthBlawg
Recently on this blog
Recently on other blogs

  • Healthcare 100 - eDrugSearch.com

Health Care Industry News

Related Posts Widget for Blogs by LinkWithin